Enhancing Community Welfare: Analysis of Village Fund Management in the Socio-Economic Sector

Authors

  • Alberto da Costa Freitasl Faculty of Political Science, Universidade de Díli (UNDIL), Dili, Timor-Leste
  • Horácio da Costa Faculty of Political Science, Universidade de Díli (UNDIL), Dili, Timor-Leste

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/laweco.v16i1.49

Keywords:

Village Fund, Community Welfare, Socio-economic Development, Fund Management, Fund Allocation

Abstract

The research investigates the impact of Village Fund management on community welfare within the socio-economic sector. The study aims to assess how effective utilization of the Village Fund influences socio-economic indicators within rural communities. Employing a mixed-method approach, data was collected through surveys, interviews, and document reviews to comprehend the relationship between fund management and community well-being. Findings revealed a positive correlation between transparent and equitable fund allocation and improvements in household income, infrastructure development, education, and healthcare services. However, challenges in transparency, disparities in fund allocation, and capacity limitations were identified, suggesting opportunities for improvement. The implications suggest that well-managed funds have the potential to uplift living standards and foster sustainable community development. Recommendations include policies for transparent allocation, capacity-building programs, and community involvement to optimize fund management and enhance community welfare. This research presents critical insights and avenues for future exploration, emphasizing the vital role of effective fund management in driving socio-economic development and promoting community welfare within rural areas.

References

Antlöv, H., Wetterberg, A., & Dharmawan, L. (2016). Village governance, community life, and the 2014 village law in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(2), 161–183.

Bond, P. (2003). Against global apartheid: South Africa meets the World Bank, IMF and international finance. Palgrave Macmillan.

Bratton, M. (1990). Non‐governmental organizations in Africa: can they influence public policy? Development and Change, 21(1), 87–118.

Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417–436.

Emanuel, E. J., Persad, G., Upshur, R., Thome, B., Parker, M., Glickman, A., Zhang, C., Boyle, C., Smith, M., & Phillips, J. P. (2020). Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of Covid-19. In New England Journal of Medicine (Vol. 382, Issue 21, pp. 2049–2055). Mass Medical Soc.

Emery, M., & Flora, C. (2020). Spiraling-up: Mapping community transformation with community capitals framework. In 50 Years of Community Development Vol I (pp. 163–179). Routledge.

Fox, J. (2007). The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 663–671.

Islam, N. (2006). Reducing rural poverty in Asia: challenges and opportunities for microenterprises and public employment schemes.

Kaur, G., Prinja, S., Lakshmi, P. V. M., Downey, L., Sharma, D., & Teerawattananon, Y. (2019). Criteria used for priority-setting for public health resource allocation in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 35(6), 474–483.

Li, S., & McCabe, S. (2013). Measuring the socio‐economic legacies of mega‐events: Concepts, propositions and indicators. International Journal of Tourism Research, 15(4), 388–402.

Lombardi, A., Caracciolo, F., Cembalo, L., Lerro, M., & Lombardi, P. (2015). How does corporate social responsibility in the food industry matter. New Medit, 14(3), 2–9.

Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2012). Localizing development: Does participation work?

Martin, A., & Lemon, M. (2001). Challenges for participatory institutions: The case of village forest committees in Karnataka, South India. Society & Natural Resources, 14(7), 585–597.

Millennium ecosystem assessment, M. E. A. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being (Vol. 5). Island press Washington, DC.

Njoh, A. J. (2002). Barriers to community participation in development planning: lessons from the Mutengene (Cameroon) self‐help water project. Community Development Journal, 37(3), 233–248.

Pallot, J. (2001). Transparency in local government: antipodean initiatives. European Accounting Review, 10(3), 645–660.

Parker, A. N., & Berthet, R. S. (2000). Promoting good local governance through social funds and decentralization. Citeseer.

Phillips, R., & Pittman, R. H. (2009). A framework for community and economic development. An Introduction to Community Development, 3–19.

Platteau, J. (2004). Monitoring elite capture in community‐driven development. Development and Change, 35(2), 223–246.

Porter, M. (2015). The competitive advantage of the inner city. In The city reader (pp. 358–371). Routledge.

Rondinelli, D. A., Nellis, J. R., & Cheema, G. S. (1983). Decentralization in developing countries. World Bank Staff Working Paper, 581, 13–28.

Saegert, S., Thompson, J. P., & Warren, M. R. (2002). Social capital and poor communities. Russell Sage Foundation.

Santos, S. C., Neumeyer, X., & Morris, M. H. (2019). Entrepreneurship education in a poverty context: An empowerment perspective. Journal of Small Business Management, 57, 6–32.

Shombong, N. F. (2010). Chad-Cameroon petroleum development and pipeline project. Impact assessment of the project to the local community: Case study of the Ocean Division of Cameroon. The University of Bergen.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-28

How to Cite

Freitasl, A. da C., & Costa, H. da. (2022). Enhancing Community Welfare: Analysis of Village Fund Management in the Socio-Economic Sector. Law and Economics, 16(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.35335/laweco.v16i1.49