Adaptive Legal Frameworks and Economic Dynamics in Emerging Tech-nologies: Navigating the Intersection for Responsible Innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/laweco.v16i3.61Keywords:
Emerging Technologies, Adaptive Legal Frameworks, Responsible Innovation, Ethical Considerations, Regulatory ApproachesAbstract
This research explores the intersection of emerging technologies, including Artificial Intelligence (AI), blockchain, and biotechnology, and the imperative for adaptive legal frameworks to regulate and encourage responsible innovation. Examining historical contexts of technological regulation, the study identifies key lessons from past approaches, emphasizing the need for flexibility, adaptability, and interdisciplinary collaboration. The economic dynamics of emerging technologies reveal both opportunities and challenges, with innovation playing a pivotal role in economic growth. Legal responses and current frameworks are scrutinized, prompting a call for ongoing evaluation and adaptation to the evolving technological landscape. Case studies highlight the effectiveness of existing regulations, while gaps in the regulatory landscape are identified. The concept of an adaptive legal framework emerges as a recommendation, promoting flexibility and agility to address the intricacies of emerging technologies. Balancing stability with adaptability, incentivizing responsible practices, and fostering collaboration among legal, technological, and economic experts are crucial components of effective regulatory measures. The research advocates for building a culture of corporate responsibility, aligning business goals with ethical standards, and promoting education and awareness across all stakeholders. The importance of training for decision-makers, especially policymakers, is underscored as pivotal for informed and ethical governance. In conclusion, this research emphasizes the urgent need for adaptive legal frameworks, interdisciplinary collaboration, continuous education, and a commitment to aligning technological progress with ethical considerations to ensure responsible and ethical innovation in the ever-evolving landscape of emerging technologies.
References
Abelson, J., Blacksher, E. A., Li, K. K., Boesveld, S. E., & Goold, S. D. (2013). Public deliberation in health policy and bioethics: mapping an emerging, interdisciplinary field. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 9(1).
Adekola, J., Dale, V. H. M., & Gardiner, K. (2017). Development of an institutional framework to guide transitions into enhanced blended learning in higher education. Research in Learning Technology, 25.
AL Thagafi, S. H., AL Mutairi, A. A., Qassem, O. K., AL Sbeay, N. E., & AL Sowailim, I. S. (2022). Revolutionizing Healthcare: The Technological Transformation of Medical Laboratory Outcomes. EPH-International Journal of Biological & Pharmaceutical Science, 8(1), 1–8.
Asante, K., Owen, R., & Williamson, G. (2014). Governance of new product development and perceptions of responsible innovation in the financial sector: insights from an ethnographic case study. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(1), 9–30.
Baldwin, R. (2013). Regulatory stability and the challenges of re-regulating. Centre on Regulation in Europe.
Bergek, A., Hekkert, M., Jacobsson, S., Markard, J., Sandén, B., & Truffer, B. (2015). Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 51–64.
Bhatt, G. D. (2001). Knowledge management in organizations: examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 68–75.
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1–34.
Brundage, M., Avin, S., Clark, J., Toner, H., Eckersley, P., Garfinkel, B., Dafoe, A., Scharre, P., Zeitzoff, T., & Filar, B. (2018). The malicious use of artificial intelligence: Forecasting, prevention, and mitigation. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1802.07228.
Cheng, L., Varshney, K. R., & Liu, H. (2021). Socially responsible ai algorithms: Issues, purposes, and challenges. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 71, 1137–1181.
Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Pardo, T. A., & Scholl, H. J. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2289–2297.
Cohen-Haguenauer, O. (2002). Regulatory Aspects in Gene Therapy: Special highlights on European regulation. In Manufacturing of Gene Therapeutics: Methods, Processing, Regulation, and Validation (pp. 289–310). Springer.
Cooper, D., Grey, S., Raymond, G., & Walker, P. (2005). Project Risk management guidelines managing risk in large projects and complex procurements. John Wiley & Sons.
Corea, F. (2019). Applied artificial intelligence: Where AI can be used in business (Vol. 1). Springer.
Dahlman, C. J., & Nelson, R. (1995). Social absorption capability, national innovation systems and economic development. In Social capability and long-term economic growth (pp. 82–122). Springer.
de Laat, P. B. (2021). Companies committed to responsible AI: From principles towards implementation and regulation? Philosophy & Technology, 34, 1135–1193.
Dicken, P. (2003). Global shift: Reshaping the global economic map in the 21st century. Sage.
DiMatteo, L. A., Poncibò, C., & Cannarsa, M. (2022). The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence: global perspectives on law and ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Disease, W. H. O. N., & Cluster, M. H. (2002). Innovative care for chronic conditions: building blocks for action: global report. World Health Organization.
Dove, E. S. (2018). The EU general data protection regulation: implications for international scientific research in the digital era. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 46(4), 1013–1030.
Duros, S. A. (2018). Cryptocurrency and Blockchain: Background and Regulatory Approaches. Wisconsin Legislative Reference Bureau.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., & Eirug, A. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994.
Eberhard, B., Podio, M., Alonso, A. P., Radovica, E., Avotina, L., Peiseniece, L., Caamaño Sendon, M., Gonzales Lozano, A., & Solé-Pla, J. (2017). Smart work: The transformation of the labour market due to the fourth industrial revolution (I4. 0). International Journal of Business & Economic Sciences Applied Research, 10(3).
Ehmann, F., Papaluca Amati, M., Salmonson, T., Posch, M., Vamvakas, S., Hemmings, R., Eichler, H. G., & Schneider, C. K. (2013). Gatekeepers and enablers: how drug regulators respond to a challenging and changing environment by moving toward a proactive attitude. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 93(5), 425–432.
Ernst, D. (2002). Global production networks and the changing geography of innovation systems. Implications for developing countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11(6), 497–523.
Fahy, L. A. (2022). Regulator reputation and the successful governance of innovation: Lessons from financial technology supervision. Utrecht University.
Farber, D. (2011). Navigating the intersection of environmental law and disaster law. BYU L. Rev., 1783.
Fundeanu, D. D., & Badele, C. S. (2014). The impact of regional innovative clusters on competitiveness. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 405–414.
Gough, D., & Thomas, J. (2016). Systematic reviews of research in education: Aims, myths and multiple methods. Review of Education, 4(1), 84–102.
Haddaway, N. R., Woodcock, P., Macura, B., & Collins, A. (2015). Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews. Conservation Biology, 29(6), 1596–1605.
Hagemann, R., Huddleston Skees, J., & Thierer, A. (2018). Soft law for hard problems: The governance of emerging technologies in an uncertain future. Colo. Tech. LJ, 17, 37.
Hall, C. M. (2021). Constructing sustainable tourism development: The 2030 agenda and the managerial ecology of sustainable tourism. In Activating Critical Thinking to Advance the Sustainable Development Goals in Tourism Systems (pp. 198–214). Routledge.
Han, H. (2022). The impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and blockchain adoption in corporate governance: ethical perspectives. Brunel University London.
Hanseth, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet. Journal of Information Technology, 25, 1–19.
Hauri, A., Kohler, K., Roth, F., Käser, M., Prior, T., & Scharte, B. (2020). Trend Analysis Civil Protection 2030: Uncertainties, Challenges and Opportunities. CSS Risk and Resilience Reports.
Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413–432.
Helbig, N., Gil-García, J. R., & Ferro, E. (2009). Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 89–97.
Holden, E., Linnerud, K., & Banister, D. (2017). The imperatives of sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 25(3), 213–226.
Holland, B. (2020). Emerging Technology and Today’s Libraries. In Emerging Trends and Impacts of the Internet of Things in Libraries (pp. 1–33). IGI Global.
Karale, A. (2021). The challenges of IoT addressing security, ethics, privacy, and laws. Internet of Things, 15, 100420.
Kavanagh, C. (2019). New tech, new threats, and new governance challenges: an opportunity to craft smarter responses? Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Kenning, P., & Linzmajer, M. (2011). Consumer neuroscience: An overview of an emerging discipline with implications for consumer policy. Journal Für Verbraucherschutz Und Lebensmittelsicherheit, 6(1).
Klerkx, L., Aarts, N., & Leeuwis, C. (2010). Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agricultural Systems, 103(6), 390–400.
Kretschmer, M., Pennekamp, J., & Wehrle, K. (2021). Cookie banners and privacy policies: Measuring the impact of the GDPR on the web. ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB), 15(4), 1–42.
Latonero, M. (2018). Governing artificial intelligence: Upholding human rights & dignity.
Laurie, G., Harmon, S. H. E., & Arzuaga, F. (2012). Foresighting futures: law, new technologies, and the challenges of regulating for uncertainty. Law, Innovation and Technology, 4(1), 1–33.
Leal Filho, W., Wall, T., Mucova, S. A. R., Nagy, G. J., Balogun, A.-L., Luetz, J. M., Ng, A. W., Kovaleva, M., Azam, F. M. S., & Alves, F. (2022). Deploying artificial intelligence for climate change adaptation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 180, 121662.
Lee, D., & Yoon, S. N. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence-based technologies in the healthcare industry: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 271.
Lee, M., Yun, J. J., Pyka, A., Won, D., Kodama, F., Schiuma, G., Park, H., Jeon, J., Park, K., & Jung, K. (2018). How to respond to the fourth industrial revolution, or the second information technology revolution? Dynamic new combinations between technology, market, and society through open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(3), 21.
Leenes, R., Palmerini, E., Koops, B.-J., Bertolini, A., Salvini, P., & Lucivero, F. (2017). Regulatory challenges of robotics: some guidelines for addressing legal and ethical issues. Law, Innovation and Technology, 9(1), 1–44.
Lescrauwaet, A.-K., Lescroart, J., ten Hoopen, F., Koho, K., Sirola, M., & Andrusaitis, A. (n.d.). Work package 4.
Lim, D. (2017). Retooling the patent-antitrust intersection: Insights from behavioral economics. Baylor L. Rev., 69, 124.
Lindsay, M. G. (2022). International Rise of Cryptocurrency: A Comparative Review of the United States, Mexico, Singapore, and Switzerland’s Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Regulation. SCJ Int’l L. & Bus., 19, 161.
Lordkipanidze, M., Brezet, H., & Backman, M. (2005). The entrepreneurship factor in sustainable tourism development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(8), 787–798.
McGarity, T. O., & Wagner, W. E. (2010). Bending science: How special interests corrupt public health research. Harvard University Press.
McNeill, J. R. (2001). Something new under the sun: An environmental history of the twentieth-century world (the global century series). WW Norton & Company.
Meyer, H. (2016). Biotechnology for the production of chemicals, intermediates, and pharmaceutical ingredients. Green Biocatalysis, 643–674.
Munene, M. B., Swartling, Å. G., & Thomalla, F. (2018). Adaptive governance as a catalyst for transforming the relationship between development and disaster risk through the Sendai Framework? International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 28, 653–663.
Ng, K. K. H., Chen, C.-H., Lee, C. K. M., Jiao, J. R., & Yang, Z.-X. (2021). A systematic literature review on intelligent automation: Aligning concepts from theory, practice, and future perspectives. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 47, 101246.
Nugent, J. D. (2012). Safeguarding federalism: How states protect their interests in national policymaking. University of Oklahoma Press.
Organization, W. H. (2021). Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: WHO guidance.
Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., Macnaghten, P., Gorman, M., Fisher, E., & Guston, D. (2013). A framework for responsible innovation. Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, 27–50.
Paddison, R., & Hutton, T. (2014). Cities and economic change: restructuring and dislocation in the global metropolis. Sage.
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354–365.
Pansera, M., & Fressoli, M. (2021). Innovation without growth: Frameworks for understanding technological change in a post-growth era. Organization, 28(3), 380–404.
Pavie, X., Carthy, D., & Scholten, V. (2014). Responsible innovation: From concept to practice. World Scientific.
Piergentili, R., Del Rio, A., Signore, F., Umani Ronchi, F., Marinelli, E., & Zaami, S. (2021). CRISPR-Cas and its wide-ranging applications: From human genome editing to environmental implications, technical limitations, hazards and bioethical issues. Cells, 10(5), 969.
Pogrebna, G., & Skilton, M. (2019). Navigating new cyber risks: How businesses can plan, build and manage safe spaces in the digital age. Springer.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.
Qi, Y. (2022). Changes of Legal Scenarios in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Frontiers L. China, 17, 67.
Rodrigues, R. (2020). Legal and human rights issues of AI: Gaps, challenges and vulnerabilities. Journal of Responsible Technology, 4, 100005.
Scherer, A. G., & Voegtlin, C. (2020). Corporate governance for responsible innovation: Approaches to corporate governance and their implications for sustainable development. Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(2), 182–208.
Schintler, L. A., & McNeely, C. L. (2022). Artificial intelligence, institutions, and resilience: Prospects and provocations for cities. Journal of Urban Management, 11(2), 256–268.
Sherlock, R., & Morrey, J. D. (2002). Ethical issues in biotechnology. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Shukla, A., & Stocker, V. (2019). Navigating the landscape of programmable networks: looking beyond the regulatory status quo. TPRC47: The 47th Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(7), 333–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sonnenberg, S., Mason, L., Lim, Y., & Reddi, T. (2022). Towards a Human Rights-Based Approach to New and Emerging Technologies. Policy Paper Series on New and Emerging Digital Technologies and Human Rights.
Sovacool, B. K., Hess, D. J., & Cantoni, R. (2021). Energy transitions from the cradle to the grave: a meta-theoretical framework integrating responsible innovation, social practices, and energy justice. Energy Research & Social Science, 75, 102027.
Spira, L. F., & Page, M. (2003). Risk management: The reinvention of internal control and the changing role of internal audit. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16(4), 640–661.
Spokas, K. A. (2010). Review of the stability of biochar in soils: predictability of O: C molar ratios. Carbon Management, 1(2), 289–303.
Tallon, P. P., Queiroz, M., Coltman, T., & Sharma, R. (2019). Information technology and the search for organizational agility: A systematic review with future research possibilities. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 218–237.
Tao, M., Jiang, R., & Downs, C. (2022). Ethics of Face Recognition in Smart Cities Toward Trustworthy AI. In Big Data Privacy and Security in Smart Cities (pp. 23–52). Springer.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.
Turekian, V., Jeong, T., Gronvall, G. K., Prescott, E., Lee, G., Lewis, R., & Woods, B. (2018). Building a smart partnership for the fourth industrial revolution.
Turjo, M. Das, Khan, M. M., Kaur, M., & Zaguia, A. (2021). Smart supply chain management using the blockchain and smart contract. Scientific Programming, 2021, 1–12.
Verdier, P.-H. (2009). Transnational regulatory networks and their limits. Yale J. Int’l L., 34, 113.
Voegtlin, C., & Scherer, A. G. (2017). Responsible innovation and the innovation of responsibility: Governing sustainable development in a globalized world. Journal of Business Ethics, 143, 227–243.
Von Schomberg, R. (2012). Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. Technikfolgen Abschätzen Lehren: Bildungspotenziale Transdisziplinärer Methoden, 39–61.
Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Autio, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, 24, 335–350.
Yigitcanlar, T., Corchado, J. M., Mehmood, R., Li, R. Y. M., Mossberger, K., & Desouza, K. (2021). Responsible urban innovation with local government artificial intelligence (AI): A conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 71.
Zabaniotou, A., Syrgiannis, C., Gasperin, D., de Hoyos Guevera, A. J., Fazenda, I., & Huisingh, D. (2020). From multidisciplinarity to transdisciplinarity and from local to global foci: integrative approaches to systemic resilience based upon the value of life in the context of environmental and gender vulnerabilities with a special focus upon the Brazilian Amazon biome. Sustainability, 12(20), 8407.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Lyytinen Lescrauwaet, Hekkert Wagner, Cheng Yoon, Sovacool Shukla
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
