Exploring the Socio-Economic Implications of the Ban on Importing Used Clothes: Traders' Responses at Tanjung Balai TPO Market

Authors

  • Masna Sopiah Silalahi Universitas Dharma Agung, Medan, Indonesia
  • Delima Delima Universitas Asahan, Asahan, Indonesia
  • Karisma Tobing Universitas Asahan, Asahan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/laweco.v16i3.62

Keywords:

Used Clothing Trade, Ban Impact, Traders' Responses, Socio-economic Implications, Market Adaptations

Abstract

This research examines the repercussions of the ban on importing used clothes into Tanjung Balai TPO Market, focusing on the responses of traders, shifts in consumer behavior, and broader socio-economic implications. The ban, enacted to address environmental concerns and foster local industry growth, triggered multifaceted changes within the marketplace. Employing a mixed-method approach, qualitative and quantitative data were gathered through interviews, surveys, and market analyses. The ban's impact was multifaceted, disrupting traders' operations, altering consumer access to affordable clothing, and prompting debates about the balance between policy objectives and socio-economic well-being. Unintended consequences, including challenges to livelihoods and alterations in market dynamics, underscored the complexity of policy interventions in trade ecosystems. Looking forward, the market's future is poised for further adaptations, digital integrations, and potential policy shifts balancing sustainability with community needs. The findings underscore the necessity for nuanced policy frameworks that reconcile environmental aspirations with socio-economic stability. The research illuminates the intricate interplay between policy interventions, market responses, and socio-economic equilibrium, emphasizing the traders' resilience and the evolving narrative within this dynamic marketplace.

References

Anisul Huq, F., Stevenson, M., & Zorzini, M. (2014). Social sustainability in developing country suppliers: An exploratory study in the ready made garments industry of Bangladesh. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(5), 610–638.

Baldwin, R. E., McLaren, J., & Panagariya, A. (2000). Regulatory protectionism, developing nations, and a two-tier world trade system [with comments and discussion]. Brookings Trade Forum, 237–293.

Buhalis, D., Harwood, T., Bogicevic, V., Viglia, G., Beldona, S., & Hofacker, C. (2019). Technological disruptions in services: lessons from tourism and hospitality. Journal of Service Management, 30(4), 484–506.

Combes, P.-P. (2000). Economic structure and local growth: France, 1984–1993. Journal of Urban Economics, 47(3), 329–355.

De Leo, G. A., & Levin, S. (1997). The multifaceted aspects of ecosystem integrity. Conservation Ecology, 1(1).

Fine, J. (2017). New approaches to enforcing labor standards: How co-enforcement partnerships between government and civil society are showing the way forward. U. Chi. Legal F., 143.

Gereffi, G., & Memedovic, O. (2003). The global apparel value chain: What prospects for upgrading by developing countries. United Nations Industrial Development Organization Vienna.

Giarratana, M. S., Pasquini, M., & Santaló, J. (2021). Leveraging synergies versus resource redeployment: Sales growth and variance in product portfolios of diversified firms. Strategic Management Journal, 42(12), 2245–2272.

Goshen, Z., & Parchomovsky, G. (2001). On Insider Trading, Markets, and" Negative" Property Rights in Information. Virginia Law Review, 1229–1277.

Guides, R. (2015). The Rough Guide to Malaysia, Singapore & Brunei. Rough Guides UK.

Jackson, M. O. (2005). A survey of network formation models: stability and efficiency. Group Formation in Economics: Networks, Clubs, and Coalitions, 664, 11–49.

Johnson, L. (2020). A Remembering of Culture and Community: An Exploration of the Ambiguity and Significance of Everyday Affordable Sustainable Clothing. Auckland University of Technology.

Kuran, T., & Sunstein, C. R. (1998). Availability cascades and risk regulation. Stan. L. Rev., 51, 683.

Lindell, P. N. (2000). The longhouse and the legacy of history: Religion, architecture, and change among the Bisingai of Sarawak. University of Nevada, Reno.

Long, N. J. (2013). Being Malay in Indonesia: Histories, hopes and citizenship in the Riau Archipelago. NUS Press.

Manhart, A., Osibanjo, O., Aderinto, A., & Prakash, S. (2011). Informal e-waste management in Lagos, Nigeria–socio-economic impacts and feasibility of international recycling co-operations. Final Report of Component, 3, 1–129.

Neelakantan, V. (1949). Health and Medicine in Soekarno Era Indonesia: Social Medicine. Public Health and Medicine Education.

Nor, M. A. M., & Burridge, S. (2020). Sharing identities: Celebrating dance in Malaysia. Taylor & Francis.

Oguadinma, E. (2017). Developing E-commerce Practices for Paradise Boutiques Lagos.

Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship: Teaching socio-scientific issues. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Ryle, J. (2016). My God, my land: Interwoven paths of Christianity and tradition in Fiji. Routledge.

Sarpong, G. D., Howard, E. K., & Osei-Ntiri, K. (2011). Globalization of the fashion industry and its effects on Ghanaian independent fashion designers. Journal of Science and Technology (Ghana), 31(3), 97–106.

Skinner, J. B. (2019). Fashioning waste: Considering the global and local impacts of the secondhand clothing trade in Accra, Ghana and Charting an inclusive path forward. University of Cincinnati.

Vergara, S. E., & Tchobanoglous, G. (2012). Municipal solid waste and the environment: a global perspective. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, 277–309.

Vorley, B., Lundy, M., & MacGregor, J. (2009). Business models that are inclusive of small farmers. In Agro-industries for development (pp. 186–222). CABI Wallingford UK.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-30

How to Cite

Silalahi, M. S., Delima, D., & Tobing, K. (2022). Exploring the Socio-Economic Implications of the Ban on Importing Used Clothes: Traders’ Responses at Tanjung Balai TPO Market. Law and Economics, 16(3), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.35335/laweco.v16i3.62