Ideological Radicalization Among Adolescents: Multidimensional Analysis and Prevention Strategies
Keywords:
Ideological Radicalization, Adolescents, Prevention Strategies, Multidimensional Analysis, Social InfluencesAbstract
Ideological radicalization among adolescents poses significant challenges to societal stability and security, necessitating comprehensive strategies for prevention and intervention. This research conducts a multidimensional analysis to explore the complex interplay of social influences, individual vulnerabilities, and ideological exposure in shaping susceptibility to extremist ideologies among adolescents. Drawing upon empirical findings, theoretical frameworks, and insights from existing literature, the study elucidates key patterns, relationships, and implications for policy, practice, and future research in the field. The analysis reveals the influential role of peer networks in amplifying vulnerability to radicalization, while also highlighting the nuanced dynamics of family influences and individual vulnerabilities. Psychological factors, such as identity crises and trauma, are identified as critical determinants of susceptibility to extremist narratives. Moreover, the proliferation of online radicalization emerges as a significant driver of radicalization processes, underscoring the importance of targeted interventions to address online influences and promote media literacy among adolescents. Policy implications emphasize the need for integrated approaches to prevention, including investments in education, community engagement, and online regulation. Practitioners are encouraged to prioritize community-based interventions and early support services to address underlying drivers of radicalization among at-risk adolescents.
References
Abrahams, J. A. (2017). Ideological radicalization: a conceptual framework for understanding why youth in major US metropolitan areas are more likely to become radicalized. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School.
Ahmed, K., Belanger, P., & Szmania, S. (2018). Community-focused counter-radicalization and counter-terrorism projects: Experiences and lessons learned. Rowman & Littlefield.
Al Raffie, D. (2013). Social identity theory for investigating Islamic extremism in the diaspora. Journal of Strategic Security, 6(4), 67–91.
Alimi, E. Y., Bosi, L., & Demetriou, C. (2015). The dynamics of radicalization: A relational and comparative perspective. Oxford University Press.
Almeida, F. (2018). Strategies to perform a mixed methods study. European Journal of Education Studies.
Baffa, R. C., Vest, N., Chan, W. Y., & Fanlo, A. (2019). Defining and Understanding the.
Campelo, N., Oppetit, A., Neau, F., Cohen, D., & Bronsard, G. (2018). Who are the European youths willing to engage in radicalisation? A multidisciplinary review of their psychological and social profiles. European Psychiatry, 52, 1–14.
Côté, J. E. (2009). Identity formation and self-development in adolescence. Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, 1(3), 266–304.
Crone, M. (2016). Radicalization revisited: violence, politics and the skills of the body. International Affairs, 92(3), 587–604.
Ducol, B., Bouchard, M., Davies, G., Ouellet, M., & Neudecker, C. (2016). Assessment of the state of knowledge: Connections between research on the social psychology of the Internet and violent extremism. TSAS The Canadian Network for Research on Terrorism, Security, and Society ….
Elshimi, M. (2014). Prevent 2011 and counter-radicalisation: What is de-radicalisation? In Counter-Radicalisation (pp. 206–222). Routledge.
Giammaria, C., Nicholson, A., & Snair, J. (2017). Countering violent extremism through public health practice: Proceedings of a workshop. National Academies Press.
Green, S., & Proctor, K. (2016). Turning point: A new comprehensive strategy for countering violent extremism. Rowman & Littlefield.
Harder, Q. N. (2018). Qualitative Case Study Analysis of Domestic Terrorist Data for Use in Community-Based Counternarrative Program Development. Northcentral University.
Harpviken, A. N. (2020). Psychological vulnerabilities and extremism among western youth: A literature review. Adolescent Research Review, 5(1), 1–26.
Herschinger, E., Bozay, K., von Drachenfels, M., Decker, O., & Joppke, C. (2020). A threat to open societies? Conceptualizing the radicalization of society. International Journal of Conflict and Violence (IJCV), 14, 1–16.
Levin, B. (2013). American Gangsters: RICO, Criminal Syndicates, and Conspiracy Law as Market Control. Harv. CR-CLL Rev., 48, 105.
Lösel, F., King, S., Bender, D., & Jugl, I. (2018). Protective factors against extremism and violent radicalization: A systematic review of research. International Journal of Developmental Science, 12(1–2), 89–102.
Marsden, S. (2020). Radicalization: Trajectories in research, policy and practice. International Journal of Conflict and Violence (IJCV), 14, 1–6.
McGuire, R. H. (2008). Archaeology as political action (Vol. 17). Univ of California Press.
Ozer, S., & Bertelsen, P. (2019). Countering radicalization: An empirical examination from a life psychological perspective. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 25(3), 211.
Pisoiu, D., Zick, A., Srowig, F., Roth, V., & Seewald, K. (2020). Factors of individual radicalization into extremism, violence and terror–the German contribution in a context. International Journal of Conflict and Violence (IJCV), 14, 1–13.
Puigvert, L., Aiello, E., Oliver, E., & Ramis-Salas, M. (2020). Grassroots community actors leading the way in the prevention of youth violent radicalization. PLoS One, 15(10), e0239897.
Rickford, R. (2016). We are an African people: Independent education, Black power, and the radical imagination. Oxford University Press.
Song, F. W. (2009). Virtual communities: Bowling alone, online together (Vol. 54). Peter Lang.
Soriano, F. I. (2012). Conducting needs assessments: A multidisciplinary approach (Vol. 68). Sage Publications.
Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491–503.
Topal, R. (2019). A cyber-psychological and behavioral approach to online radicalization. In Multigenerational online behavior and media use: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 1031–1042). IGI Global.
Van den Bos, K. (2018). Why people radicalize: How unfairness judgments are used to fuel radical beliefs, extremist behaviors, and terrorism. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ahmad Zain Sarnoto, Lamya Hayatina, Sri Tuti Rahmawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
