Transforming Primary School Science Education: The Quantum Teaching Revolution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/jiph.v11i1.14Keywords:
Quantum Teaching, Primary School Science Education, Holistic Learning, Critical Thinking, Student EngagementAbstract
In a world characterized by rapid technological advancements and evolving educational needs, the quest for innovative teaching methodologies has never been more crucial. This research delves into the transformative potential of quantum teaching in the realm of primary school science education. Quantum teaching, inspired by the principles of quantum physics, reimagines the classroom as a dynamic arena for holistic learning, critical thinking, active engagement, and creativity. The study investigates the holistic nature of quantum teaching, emphasizing the interconnectedness of scientific concepts, and the promotion of critical thinking skills essential for scientific inquiry. It explores the practical implications of implementing quantum teaching, including curriculum design, teacher training, classroom dynamics, and assessment methods. The research reveals how quantum teaching can enhance student engagement, foster problem-solving abilities, and ignite a passion for science. It underscores the significance of this research in the context of educational improvement and the field of primary school science, as it paves the way for more dynamic and effective educational practices. This research contributes to the existing body of knowledge by introducing innovative teaching methods, emphasizing holistic learning, critical thinking, active engagement, and flexibility. It underscores the importance of creativity, interdisciplinary connections, student-centered learning, and data-driven educational improvement. By preparing students for the future, this research advances the dialogue on educational enhancement and the evolving landscape of education in a dynamic world. In conclusion, this research signifies the beginning of a new era in primary school science education, urging educators, parents, communities, and policymakers to embrace the quantum teaching frontier and unlock the potential of a new generation of scientists and thinkers.
References
Adams, J., Avraamidou, L., Bayram-Jacobs, D., Boujaoude, S., Bryan, L., Christodoulou, A., Couso, D., Danielsson, A., Dillon, J., & Erduran, S. (2018). The role of science education in a changing world. Leiden, NL: Nias Lorentz Center.
Alake-Tuenter, E., Biemans, H. J. A., Tobi, H., Wals, A. E. J., Oosterheert, I., & Mulder, M. (2012). Inquiry-based science education competencies of primary school teachers: A literature study and critical review of the American National Science Education Standards. International Journal of Science Education, 34(17), 2609–2640.
Aschbacher, P. R., Li, E., & Roth, E. J. (2010). Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 564–582.
Burkhart, N. J. (2016). Instructional Technology and Learning Analytics in Online Geographic Information Science (GIS) Education. UCLA.
Callahan, J. S., Kiker, D. S., & Cross, T. (2003). Does method matter? A meta-analysis of the effects of training method on older learner training performance. Journal of Management, 29(5), 663–680.
Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2002). Student-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 521–549.
Council, N. R. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press.
Davis, H. A. (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student-teacher relationships on children’s social and cognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 207–234.
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.
Fisher, C. W., Berliner, D. C., Filby, N. N., Marliave, R., Cahen, L. S., & Dishaw, M. M. (1981). Teaching behaviors, academic learning time, and student achievement: An overview. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 17(1), 2–15.
Ginsburg, H. P., Lee, J. S., & Boyd, J. S. (2008). Mathematics Education for Young Children: What It Is and How to Promote It. Social Policy Report. Volume 22, Number 1. Society for Research in Child Development.
Grabinger, R. S., & Dunlap, J. C. (1995). Rich environments for active learning: A definition. ALT-J, 3(2), 5–34.
Harden, R. M. (1986). Ten questions to ask when planning a course or curriculum. Medical Education, 20(4), 356–365.
Holton, M. G. (2017). The Influence of Globalization and Educational Policy on Development of 21st-Century Skills and Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics and the Science and Technology Fairs in Schools Such as Lucan School in Ireland. University of Southern California.
Klichowski, M. (2017). Learning in CyberParks. A theoretical and empirical study. Adam Mickiewicz University Press.
Kurfiss, J. G. (1988). Critical Thinking: Theory, Research, Practice, and Possibilities. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 2, 1988. ERIC.
Lastasa, M., & Habaridota, B. B. (2020). The Implementation Tandur Quantum Teaching Learning Model to Improve Social Learning Achievement. International Journal of Elementary Education, 4(2), 153–159.
Lindholm, M. (2018). Promoting curiosity? Possibilities and pitfalls in science education. Science & Education, 27, 987–1002.
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Blunk, M., Crawford, B., Kelly, B., & Meyer, K. M. (1994). Enacting project-based science: Experiences of four middle grade teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 517–538.
Moyles, J., Payler, J., & Georgeson, J. (2017). EBOOK: Beginning teaching, beginning learning: In early years and primary education. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Peters, O. (2013). Learning and teaching in distance education: Analyses and interpretations from an international perspective. Routledge.
Pickus, N., & Godwin, K. (2017). Liberal Arts and Sciences Innovation in China: Six Recommendations to Shape the Future.
Ritchhart, R., & Perkins, D. N. (2005). Learning to think: The challenges of teaching thinking. The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, 775–802.
Roussou, M. (2004). Learning by doing and learning through play: an exploration of interactivity in virtual environments for children. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 2(1), 10.
Scerri, E. (2019). The periodic table: its story and its significance. Oxford University Press.
Shannon, G. S., & Bylsma, P. (2002). Addressing the Achievement Gap: A Challenge for Washington State Educators.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (2009). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. Simon and Schuster.
Summers, E. J., & Dickinson, G. (2012). A longitudinal investigation of project–based instruction and student achievement in high school social studies. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 6(1), 82–103.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jadi Hatoguan Siahaan, Ferrant Marson, Oyelana Forsyth
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
