Exploring the Impact of Constructivist Learning on Students' Prob-lem-Solving Abilities in Education
Keywords:
Constructivist Learning, Problem-Solving Abilities, Education, Pedagogical Practices, Student-Centered ApproachAbstract
This research explores the influence of the constructivist learning approach on students' problem-solving abilities within the context of education. Through a comprehensive review of existing literature, theoretical frameworks, and empirical studies, the study examines the complex interplay between pedagogical practices, cognitive processes, and learning outcomes. The research adopts a mixed-methods approach, synthesizing qualitative and quantitative data to provide a nuanced understanding of the efficacy of constructivist pedagogies in fostering critical thinking, creativity, and adaptive problem-solving skills among students. Significant correlations, differences, and trends observed in the data highlight the transformative potential of student-centered, inquiry-driven approaches in education. The implications of the findings for theory and practice in education are discussed, emphasizing the importance of aligning curriculum design, assessment practices, and professional development initiatives with constructivist principles. By bridging theory and practice, educators can cultivate problem-solving minds and empower students to thrive in an increasingly complex and interconnected world.
References
Bishop, K., & Denley, P. (2007). EBOOK: Learning Science Teaching: Developing A Professional Knowledge Base. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Bonk, C. J., & Cunningham, D. J. (2012). Searching for learner-centered, constructivist, and sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In Electronic collaborators (pp. 25–50). Routledge.
Bright, D. S., Caza, A., Turesky, E. F., Putzel, R., Nelson, E., & Luechtefeld, R. (2016). Constructivist meta-practices: When students design activities, lead others, and assess peers. Journal of Leadership Education, 15(4), 75–99.
Chakraborty, D., & Biswas, W. (2020). Motivating factors in a teacher’s research and developmental activities and their impact on effective quality teaching in higher education institutions. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(4), 609–632.
Cochran-Smith, M. (2006). Constructing outcomes in teacher education: Policy, practice and pitfalls. Teacher Education: Curriculum and Change, 3, 218.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (2018). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 453–494). Routledge.
Conley, D. T. (2014). Learning Strategies as Metacognitive Factors: A Critical Review. Educational Policy Improvement Center.
Damon, W., Lerner, R. M., Renninger, K. A., & Sigel, I. E. (2007). Handbook of child psychology, child psychology in practice. John Wiley & Sons.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Deubel, P. (2003). An investigation of behaviorist and cognitive approaches to instructional multimedia design. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(1), 63–90.
Dills, C. R., & Romiszowski, A. J. (1997). Instructional development paradigms. Educational Technology.
Education, A. C. on C. and I. in D., Hendricson, W. D., Andrieu, S. C., Chadwick, D. G., Chmar, J. E., Cole, J. R., George, M. C., Glickman, G. N., Glover, J. F., & Goldberg, J. S. (2006). Educational strategies associated with development of problem‐solving, critical thinking, and self‐directed learning. Journal of Dental Education, 70(9), 925–936.
Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Teachers College Press.
Foster-Fishman, P. G., Salem, D. A., Chibnall, S., Legler, R., & Yapchai, C. (1998). Empirical support for the critical assumptions of empowerment theory. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26(4), 507–536.
Garcia, A., & O’Donnell-Allen, C. (2015). Pose, wobble, flow: A culturally proactive approach to literacy instruction. Teachers College Press.
Glynn, S. M., & Duit, R. (1995). Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice. Routledge.
Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): a framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25–41.
Hussain, S., Lindh, J., & Shukur, G. (2006). The effect of LEGO training on pupils’ school performance in mathematics, problem solving ability and attitude: Swedish data. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 9(3), 182–194.
Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 432–479.
Mohammed, S. H., & Kinyó, L. (2020). The role of constructivism in the enhancement of social studies education. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(7), 249–256.
Patton, L. D., Renn, K. A., Guido, F. M., & Quaye, S. J. (2016). Student development in college: Theory, research, and practice. John Wiley & Sons.
Poon, A., Giroux, S., Eloundou-Enyegue, P., Guimbretière, F., & Dell, N. (2019). Engaging high school students in cameroon with exam practice quizzes via sms and whatsapp. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–13.
Sharratt, L., & Planche, B. (2016). Leading collaborative learning: Empowering excellence. Corwin Press.
Smith, S. L. (1996). Making sense: Journals as tools for learning and representing student experience in a field-based doctoral program. Oregon State University.
Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(17–37), 25.
Tynjälä, P. (2001). Writing, learning and the development of expertise in higher education. In Writing as a learning tool: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 37–56). Springer.
Vanhorn, S., Ward, S. M., Weismann, K. M., Crandall, H., Reule, J., & Leonard, R. (2019). Exploring active learning theories, practices, and contexts. Communication Research Trends, 38(3), 5–25.
Voss, J. F., Greene, T. R., Post, T. A., & Penner, B. C. (1983). Problem-solving skill in the social sciences. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 17, pp. 165–213). Elsevier.
White, M. G. (2020). Why human subjects research protection is important. Ochsner Journal, 20(1), 16–33.
Woo, Y., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 15–25.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Eryansyah Putra Renninger
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
