Enhancing History Education: Evaluating the Impact of the Reciprocal Teaching Method on Students' Reading Comprehension in History Subjects
Keywords:
Reciprocal Teaching Method, Reading Comprehension, History Education, Pedagogical Strategies, Student EngagementAbstract
This research delves into the efficacy of the Reciprocal Teaching Method in enhancing students' reading comprehension within the realm of history education. The study adopts a quasi-experimental design, comparing the impact of the method against traditional instructional approaches within a specific group of history classrooms. A combination of quantitative and qualitative data sources, including pre- and post-assessments, classroom observations, and questionnaires, illuminates the method's influence on students' comprehension and engagement. The findings showcase a significant improvement in reading comprehension among students who underwent instruction using the Reciprocal Teaching Method, compared to a control group following traditional instructional practices. The method's structured and collaborative nature fosters active engagement with historical texts, propelling critical thinking skills and a deeper understanding of historical narratives. Moreover, the research emphasizes the adaptability of the method to cater to varied learning profiles, thereby advocating for inclusive pedagogical approaches within history education. The implications of the study extend to the reconfiguration of history education, calling for a shift toward interactive and engaging pedagogical strategies that nurture comprehensive understanding and critical engagement among students. This research marks a significant stride toward empowering students within history classrooms, pointing towards a transformative era in history education and paving the way for informed, engaged citizens well-versed in the complexities of the past.
References
Alfayez, A. F. (2022). Saudi teachers’ self-efficacy in implementing the Arabic language integrative curriculum. Education Research International, 2022.
Connelly, F. M., & Xu, S. (2019). Reciprocal learning in the partnership project: From knowing to doing in comparative research models. Teachers and Teaching, 25(6), 627–646.
Davis, O. L., Yeager, E. A., & Foster, S. J. (2001). Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies. Rowman & Littlefield.
Delle Fave, A., Massimini, F., & Bassi, M. (2011). Psychological selection and optimal experience across cultures: Social empowerment through personal growth (Vol. 2). Springer Science & Business Media.
Farashahi, M., & Tajeddin, M. (2018). Effectiveness of teaching methods in business education: A comparison study on the learning outcomes of lectures, case studies and simulations. The International Journal of Management Education, 16(1), 131–142.
Hämäläinen, R., & Vähäsantanen, K. (2011). Theoretical and pedagogical perspectives on orchestrating creativity and collaborative learning. Educational Research Review, 6(3), 169–184.
Hirsch, E. D. (2003). Reading comprehension requires knowledge of words and the world. American Educator, 27(1), 10–13.
Homer, J. (2017). An Analysis of Elaine Tyler May’s Homeward Bound: American Families in the Cold War Era. Macat Library.
Jaldemark, J., Hrastinski, S., Olofsson, A. D., & Öberg, L.-M. (2018). Editorial introduction: Collaborative learning enhanced by mobile technologies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 201–206.
Johnson, L., Becker, S. A., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Hall, C. (2016). NMC horizon report: 2016 higher education edition. The New Media Consortium.
Kozulin, A. (2002). Sociocultural theory and the mediated learning experience. School Psychology International, 23(1), 7–35.
Kuh, G. D., & Whitt, E. J. (1988). The Invisible Tapestry. Culture in American Colleges and Universities. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education, Report No. 1, 1988. ERIC.
Kurfiss, J. G. (1988). Critical Thinking: Theory, Research, Practice, and Possibilities. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 2, 1988. ERIC.
Levstik, L. S., & Barton, K. C. (2022). Doing history: Investigating with children in elementary and middle schools. Routledge.
Lowenthal, D. (1975). Past time, present place: landscape and memory. Geographical Review, 1–36.
Marks, J. (2009). Why I am not a scientist: anthropology and modern knowledge. Univ of California Press.
Moje, E. B., Stockdill, D., Kim, K., & Kim, H. (2011). The role of text in disciplinary learning. Handbook of Reading Research, Volume IV, 453–486.
Nokes, J. D. (2022). Building students’ historical literacies: Learning to read and reason with historical texts and evidence. Routledge.
Oczkus, L. D. (2018). Reciprocal teaching at work: Powerful strategies and lessons for improving reading comprehension. ASCD.
Risko, V. J., Roller, C. M., Cummins, C., Bean, R. M., Block, C. C., Anders, P. L., & Flood, J. (2008). A critical analysis of research on reading teacher education. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(3), 252–288.
Schuh, K. L., & Barab, S. A. (2008). Philosophical perspectives. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 67–82). Routledge.
Straub, J. (2005). Telling stories, making history. Narration, Identity, and Historical Consciousness, 44–93.
Tierney, R. J., & Cunningham, J. W. (1980). Research on teaching reading comprehension. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Toffler, A. (2022). Powershift: Knowledge, wealth, and power at the edge of the 21st century. Bantam.
VanSledright, B. A. (2010). The challenge of rethinking history education: On practices, theories, and policy. Routledge.
Weisgrau, M., Rosman, A., & Rubel, P. G. (2023). The tapestry of culture: An introduction to cultural anthropology. Rowman & Littlefield.
Williams, S. (2016). Teaching history: Effective teaching for learning history-chronological vs. Thematic approaches to student historical comprehension.
Wormeli, R. (2005). Summarization in any subject: 50 techniques to improve student learning. ASCD.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Acher Philipus Thiago, Lashira Malikha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
