Enhancing Local Government Accountability through Good Governance Policies: A Mixed-Methods Study
Keywords:
Good Governance, Accountability, Citizen Engagement, Transparency, Local GovernmentAbstract
This research investigates the implementation of good governance policies and their effect on enhancing accountability within local government systems. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the study combines qualitative interviews, focus groups, document analysis, and quantitative surveys to provide a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between governance practices and accountability outcomes. Key findings indicate that citizen engagement, transparency, and robust legal frameworks are critical components for fostering accountability. The research highlights that active citizen participation significantly correlates with improved accountability perceptions, while transparency measures are essential for building public trust. Additionally, the study identifies corruption and inefficiency as persistent challenges, emphasizing the need for effective anti-corruption strategies and inclusive policies that address socio-economic disparities. By offering practical recommendations for local governments, this research contributes valuable insights to the existing body of knowledge, advocating for a holistic approach that integrates political, legal, and administrative dimensions of accountability.
References
Ackerman, J. M. (2005). Social Accountability in the public sector.
Archdeacon, T. J. (1994). Correlation and regression analysis: a historian’s guide. Univ of Wisconsin Press.
Belina, A. (2023). Semi-structured interviewing as a tool for understanding informal civil society. Voluntary Sector Review, 14(2), 331–347.
Blind, P. K. (2007). Building trust in government in the twenty-first century: Review of literature and emerging issues. 7th Global Forum on Reinventing Government Building Trust in Government, 2007, 26–29.
Bovens, M. (2010). Two Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism. West European Politics, 33(5), 946–967.
Brennan, N. M., & Solomon, J. (2008). Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: an overview. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(7), 885–906.
Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2011). Public–private partnerships: Perspectives on purposes, publicness, and good governance. Public Administration and Development, 31(1), 2–14.
Broadbent, J., Dietrich, M., & Laughlin, R. (2002). The development of principal-agent, contracting and accountability relationships in the public sector. Public Management: Critical Perspectives, 2, 107.
Crane, A., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004). Stakeholders as citizens? Rethinking rights, participation, and democracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1), 107–122.
Dlalisa, W. T. M. (2009). Strategies for enhancing good governance in South African local government. Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch.
Friis-Hansen, E., & Kyed, H. M. (2009). Participation, decentralization and human rights: a review of approaches for strengthening voice and accountability in local governance.
Goetz, A. M., & Jenkins, R. (2005). Reinventing accountability. Making Democracy Work for Human Development. Primera Edición. Gran Bretaña: Palgrave Macmillan.
Howard, L. C., & McKinney, J. B. (1998). Public administration: Balancing power and accountability. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
Lane, J. E., & Kivisto, J. A. (2008). Interests, information, and incentives in higher education: Principal-agent theory and its potential applications to the study of higher education governance. Higher Education, 141–179.
Lund, T. (2012). Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches: Some arguments for mixed methods research. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(2), 155–165.
Mallik, A. K., & Mitra, S. (2009). Accounting and Accountability: A Stakeholder-Agent Perspective. IUP Journal of Accounting Research & Audit Practices, 8.
Mejía Acosta, A. (2013). The impact and effectiveness of accountability and transparency initiatives: The governance of natural resources. Development Policy Review, 31, s89–s105.
O’donnell, G. (2004). The quality of democracy: Why the rule of law matters. Journal of Democracy, 15(4), 32–46.
Piotrowski, S. J., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2007). Citizen attitudes toward transparency in local government. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 306–323.
Thomas, G. W. (2012). Governance, good governance, and global governance: conceptual and actual challenges. In Thinking about global governance (pp. 168–189). Routledge.
Van Kersbergen, K., & Van Waarden, F. (2009). ‘Governance’as a bridge between disciplines: Cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy. In European Corporate Governance (pp. 64–80). Routledge.
Yang, K., & Callahan, K. (2007). Citizen involvement efforts and bureaucratic responsiveness: Participatory values, stakeholder pressures, and administrative practicality. Public Administration Review, 67(2), 249–264.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Amira Fide Swastika, Surya Wibawa, Metrolitania Metrolitania, Josua Marvin, Natalia Natalia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
