Interpreting Marital Property and Inheritance Rights in Mixed Marriages: A Normative-Transcendental Approach

Authors

  • Alpan Hadi Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram, Indonesia
  • Yulias Erwin Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram, Indonesia
  • Nurjannah Septyanun Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram, Indonesia
  • Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/laweco.v19i3.207

Keywords:

Mixed Marriage, Joint Property, Inheritance Rights, Transcendental Law, Normative Juridical

Abstract

Intermarriages between Indonesian citizens and foreign nationals are becoming increasingly prevalent in Indonesia's tourist regions, along with the rise of global social and cultural connections. Despite the legal recognition and protection of mixed marriages by Law Number 1 of 1974 regarding Marriage and Law Number 12 of 2006 concerning Citizenship, their execution presents numerous legal challenges, particularly concerning citizenship status, shared property ownership, and inheritance rights. This research employs a normative legal methodology, utilizing literature review as the primary technique, and analyzes Supreme Court Decision No: XXX/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Bdg as a case study. The investigation examined pertinent legal norms, jurisprudence, and relevant legal doctrines by employing a transcendental legal method to comprehend the moral and spiritual principles underpinning these legal frameworks. The study's findings indicate that the national legal system has not adequately addressed the complexities of mixed marriages characterized by divergent legal systems and cultural origins. Restrictions on land ownership by foreign nationals present issues in mixed marriage situations about joint property. Similarly, the disparities in inheritance law systems across civil law, customary law, Islamic law, and foreign frameworks impede equitable arrangements. The transcendental legal approach provides a more inclusive and equitable perspective by grounding legal interpretation in spiritual values. This study advocates for regulatory revisions and the enhancement of international legal frameworks to achieve adaptive and compassionate legal protection that aligns with substantive justice in mixed marriages.

References

Adaki, A. Y., & Wajim, J. (2024). Cultural Adaptation and Marriage Dissolution. Vejoh-Veritas Journal of Humanities, 5(1).

Amin, S., Berenschot, W., Chaplin, C., Fauzanafi, M. Z., Hanani, R., Hearman, V., Jakimow, T., Febriany, V., van Klinken, G., & van der Muur, W. (2019). Citizenship in Indonesia: Perjuangan atas Hak, Identitas, dan Partisipasi. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Arifin, R., Riyanto, S., & Putra, A. K. (2023). Collaborative efforts in ASEAN for global asset recovery frameworks to combat corruption in the digital era. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 31(2), 329–343.

Asman, A., Sholihah, H., Zuhrah, Z., Abas, M., Hadi, A. I., Aziz, A., Muharman, D., Hidayatullah, H., Muchtar, M. I., & Qurtubi, A. N. (2023). Pengantar Hukum Perkawinan Islam Indonesia. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Assyafira, G. N., Suwono, S. H. N., Wardana, C. V. C., & Cholis, A. S. (2024). Pembagian Dividen Tunai terkait Harta Perkawinan jika Terjadi Perceraian. Notaire, 7(3).

Bakarbessy, L., & Handajani, S. (2012). Kewarganegaraan ganda anak dalam perkawinan campuran dan implikasinya dalam hukum perdata internasional. Perspektif, 17(1), 1–9.

Banerji, M., & Deshpande, A. S. (2021). Does ‘Love’make a difference? Marriage choice and post-marriage decision-making power in India. Asian Population Studies, 17(2), 201–220.

Bennett, L. R. (2020). Modernity, desire and courtship: the evolution of premarital relationships in Mataram, Eastern Indonesia. In Coming of age in South and Southeast Asia (pp. 96–112). Routledge.

bin Abdullah, M. A. (2024). Analyzing the dynamics between Sharia law and civil law in governing divorce proceedings among Muslims in Malaysia and comparing legal outcomes. Law and Economy, 3(4), 29–38.

Block, L., & Bonjour, S. (2013). Fortress Europe or Europe of rights? The Europeanisation of family migration policies in France, Germany and the Netherlands. European Journal of Migration and Law, 15(2), 203–224.

Boscarolli, S. (2015). Characterization of Separate Property within the Community Property Systems of the United States and Italy: An Ideal Approach. Gonz. J. Int’l L., 19, 31.

Breger, R., & Hill, R. (2021). Introducing mixed marriages. In Cross-cultural marriage (pp. 1–32). Routledge.

Dewi, A. S., & Syafitri, I. (2022). Analisis perkawinan campuran dan akibat hukumnya. Juripol (Jurnal Institusi Politeknik Ganesha Medan), 5(1), 179–191.

Dewi, N. K., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Suryani, L. P. (2022). Pendaftaran Kewarganegaraan Anak Hasil Perkawinan Campuran. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 3(2), 275–281.

Fitri, W., & Elviani, E. (2021). Prenuptial Agreement Terhadap Perkawinan Campuran: Suatu Kajian Perspektif Hukum Di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 7(2), 924–942.

Hensley, D. C. (2021). Property law and the intestacy entitlement. Alb. L. Rev., 85, 557.

Indrayanti, K. W., Saraswati, A. A. A. N., & Putra, E. N. (2024). Questioning human rights, looking for justice: Analyzing the impact of supreme court circular letter on interfaith marriages in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 9(1), 385–416.

Johnny Ibrahim. (2005). Teori dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Bayumedia Publishing.

Kalek, S. (2024). Challenges and Issues in Mixed Marriage Between the Indonesian and Non-Indonesian Diaspora. SMART: Journal of Sharia, Traditon, and Modernity, 4(2), 90–106.

Khaq, M. A. W., Za’far, Y. A., Aisyah, Y. N., Pratiwi, F. M., & Alfanny, M. F. I. (2024). Implikasi Hukum Perjanjian Pra Nikah dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Rumah Tangga. As-Sakinah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 2(2), 87–101.

Kurniawan, A. J., Wulandari, E., Manurung, M. E., & Manurung, N. E. (2017). Aculturation in Mixed Marriage Family (A Case Study In The Inter-Cultural Communication In Javanese And Tionghoa In Medan). International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 6(7), 21–25.

Lestari, S. I. (2023). PERKEMBANGAN ANEKA WARNA HUKUM (RECHTBEDELING) DI INDONESIA: PLURALISME HUKUM WARIS DI INDONESIA. Syntax Idea, 5(12).

Levitan, S. A., & Willoughby, K. R. (2021). Realizing the Full Value of Hard to Value Assets. J. Am. Acad. Matrimonial Law., 34, 133.

Lukito, R. (2008). Hukum sakral dan kukum sekuler: Studi tentang konflik dan resolusi dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Pustaka Alvabet.

McCormack, J. L. (2007). Title to Property, Title to Marriage: The Social Foundation of Adverse Possession and Common Law Marriage. Val. UL Rev., 42, 461.

Milun, K., Walsh, T., & Pitner, M. (2022). Bringing New Light to One of the Oldest Forms of Property Ownership: An Innovative Solution for Benefitting Underserved Communities Using the Solar Commons Community Trust Model. Vt. L. Rev., 47, 384.

Morley, J. D. (2023). Strategic Planning for International Divorces. J. Am. Acad. Matrimonial Law., 36, 417.

Mujiburohman, D. A., Salim, M. N., Junarto, R., & Sutaryono, S. (2023). Mixed marriage in Indonesia: joint property and foreign land ownership restrictions. The Lawyer Quarterly, 13(4).

Naratama, T., & Dewi, A. T. (2023). Perceraian Pada Perkawinan Campuran Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdata Internasional. Warta Dharmawangsa, 17(3), 1283–1294.

Nasir, M. A. (2022). Negotiating Muslim Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia: Integration and Conflict in Islamic Law. Mazahib, 21(2), 155–186.

Nugroho, S. S. (2016). Pengembangan Epistemologi Ilmu Hukum Berbasis Transendental. Perspektif, 21(2), 97–104.

Nuryadi, N. (2022). Post-Divorce Child Custody Problems Based on Court Decisions. Ratio Legis Journal, 2(1), 546–555.

Olujobi, O. J. (2021). Recouping proceeds of corruption: is there any need to reverse extant trends by enacting civil forfeiture legal regime in Nigeria? Journal of Money Laundering Control, 24(4), 806–833.

Pratama, M. A., Zega, M. S., Muhdiya, I., Butar, H. F. B., & Maylafaiza, H. (2024). Perjanjian Pranikah dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdata di Indonesia. As-Syirkah: Islamic Economic & Financial Journal, 3(3), 1556–1565.

Renalds, T. G. (2011). Communication in intercultural marriages: Managing cultural differences and conflict for marital satisfaction.

Richmond, H. (2009). Missiological understandings arising from Muslim-Christian marriages in Indonesia and Australia.

Robinson, K. (2007). Marriage migration, gender transformations, and family values in the ‘global ecumene.’ Gender, Place & Culture, 14(4), 483–497.

Rodríguez-García, D. (2006). Mixed marriages and transnational families in the intercultural context: A case study of African–Spanish couples in Catalonia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 32(3), 403–433.

Romadhon, A. D., & Bahori, A. (2023). Inter-religious marriage in Indonesia: Pros and cons in the administrative and constitutional law. Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev), 6(2), 133–176.

Salsabilla, T. T., Taruno Muryanto, Y., & Kusumawati, E. D. (2024). The Legal Position Of Marriage Agreements Regarding Land Rights In Mixed Marriages In Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, 5(6), 1049–1060. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v5i6.901

Saner, R., Yiu, L., & Filadoro, M. (2019). Tourism development in least developed countries: Challenges and opportunities. Sustainable Tourism: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice, 94–120.

Scolnicov, A. (2010). The right to religious freedom in international law: between group rights and individual rights. Routledge.

Sidabutar, O., Amalia, L., & Abas, M. (2024). the Effects of Mixed Marriage Laws on the Division of Property Under the Marriage Law and International Civil Principles. Awang Long Law Review, 6(2), 490–497.

Sidik, P. (2023). Pendekatan Normatif Sebagai Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Islam. As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, 5(3), 1010–1022.

Simanjuntak, E. (2017). Esensi sengketa administrasi pertanahan di peradilan tata usaha negara. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 3(2), 171–188.

Simanjuntak, E. (2020). The Rise and the Fall of the Jurisdiction of Indonesia’s Administrative Courts: Impediments and Prospects. Indon. L. Rev., 10, 159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v10n2.611

Sirait, A. D., & Salam, N. E. (2020). Family Communication in Mixed Marriage Couples Between Indonesia-Australia. International Journal of Media and Communication Research, 1(2), 24–33.

Stahnke, T., & Blitt, R. C. (2004). The religion-state relationship and the right to freedom of religion or belief: A comparative textual analysis of the constitutions of predominantly Muslim countries. Geo. j. Int’l L., 36, 947.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan, Pub. L. No. 45 (1974).

Vaughn, M. J. (1967). The Policy of Community Property and Inter-Spousal Transactions. Baylor L. Rev., 19, 20.

Viarengo, I., & Villata, F. C. (2020). Planning the Future of Cross Border Families: A Path Through Coordination. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Wahib, A. B. (2022). Marriage Registration and Solemnization among Migrant Muslims in Germany: Harmonizing Islamic and State Law and the Existence of Origin Country Law. Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 15(2), 275–294.

Wardiono, K. (2019). Prophetic: An Epistemological Offer for Legal Studies. Journal of Transendental Law, 1(1), 17–41.

Wardle, L. D. (2010). Marriage and Religious Liberty: Comparative Law Problems and Conflict of Laws Solutions. JL & Fam. Stud., 12, 315.

Yuli, S. B. C. (2024). Understanding the dynamics of tourist experience through a qualitative lens: A case study approach in Indonesia. Global Review of Tourism and Social Sciences, 1(1), 30–40.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-30

How to Cite

Hadi, A., Erwin, Y., Septyanun, N., & Jiwantara, F. A. (2025). Interpreting Marital Property and Inheritance Rights in Mixed Marriages: A Normative-Transcendental Approach. Law and Economics, 19(3), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.35335/laweco.v19i3.207