Legal Responsibility of Doctors in Determining Working Capacity Based on the Results of Worker Health Examinations

Authors

  • Rosmawati Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Militer, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Nasser Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Militer, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Tri Agus Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Militer, Jakarta, Indonesia

Keywords:

Doctors, Health Examinations, Legal Responsibility, Workers, Work Eligibility

Abstract

One important part of occupational safety and health protection efforts is health examinations for workers. In this process, doctors play a central role in determining whether a worker is medically fit to perform their job duties. This decision on fitness for work is not only medical in nature, but also has significant legal implications for workers, employers, and doctors themselves. This study aims to examine the legal responsibilities of doctors in determining work fitness based on the results of medical examinations, as well as to explore the limitations and professional obligations of doctors in the context of employment. The research method used is normative juridical with a regulatory and literature study approach. The results of the study show that doctors are required to prioritize the principles of prudence, professionalism, and objectivity in providing medical assessments of work fitness. Errors or negligence in providing recommendations can lead to legal liability, whether civil, criminal, or medical ethics. Therefore, it is important for doctors to understand the legal basis, professional standards, and medical ethics in carrying out occupational health examinations

References

Anwar, Y., Zarzani, T. R., & Chermanto, C. (2023). TANGGUNG JAWAB HUKUM PETUGAS FISIKAWAN MEDIS TERHADAP KUALITAS MUTU PADA IZIN OPERASIONAL RADIOLOGI DI RUMAH SAKIT BHAYANGKARA BANDA ACEH. SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan, 2(8), 2263–2282.

Budianto, A. (2020). Legal research methodology reposition in research on social science. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9(1), 1339–1346.

Casas‐Herrero, Á., Saez de Asteasu, M. L., Antón‐Rodrigo, I., Sánchez‐Sánchez, J. L., Montero‐Odasso, M., Marín‐Epelde, I., Ramón‐Espinoza, F., Zambom‐Ferraresi, F., Petidier‐Torregrosa, R., & Elexpuru‐Estomba, J. (2022). Effects of Vivifrail multicomponent intervention on functional capacity: a multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 13(2), 884–893.

Chien, S.-Y., Chuang, M.-C., & Chen, I.-P. (2020). Why people do not attend health screenings: factors that influence willingness to participate in health screenings for chronic diseases. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10), 3495.

Jain, A., Hassard, J., Leka, S., Di Tecco, C., & Iavicoli, S. (2021). The role of occupational health services in psychosocial risk management and the promotion of mental health and well-being at work. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(7), 3632.

Jarvis, C. (2023). Physical Examination and Health Assessment-Canadian E-Book: Physical Examination and Health Assessment-Canadian E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences.

Kunyahamu, M. S., Daud, A., & Jusoh, N. (2021). Obesity among health-care workers: which occupations are at higher risk of being obese? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(8), 4381.

Lin, R.-T., Lin, Y.-T., Hsia, Y.-F., & Kuo, C.-C. (2021). Long working hours and burnout in health care workers: non-linear dose-response relationship and the effect mediated by sleeping hours—a cross-sectional study. Journal of Occupational Health, 63(1), e12228.

Mahanani, E. S. (2020). Tingkat Disiplin Dan Tanggungjawab Tenaga Medis Dalam Penyelenggaraan Rekam Medis Dan Hubungannya Dengan Keterlambatan Pengembaliannya (Studi di RS Bhayangkara Pusdik Brimob Watukosek, Gempol Pasuruan). Jurnal Mitra Manajemen, 4(10), 1440–1448.

Matippanna, A. (2022). Hukum Kesehatan: Tanggung Jawab Hukum Rumah Sakit Terhadap Pasien Dalam Pelaksanaan Pelayanan Kesehatan. AMERTA MEDIA.

McClure, E. S., Vasudevan, P., Bailey, Z., Patel, S., & Robinson, W. R. (2020). Racial capitalism within public health—how occupational settings drive COVID-19 disparities. American Journal of Epidemiology, 189(11), 1244–1253.

Molenaar, C. J. L., Minnella, E. M., Coca-Martinez, M., Ten Cate, D. W. G., Regis, M., Awasthi, R., Martínez-Palli, G., López-Baamonde, M., Sebio-Garcia, R., & Feo, C. V. (2023). Effect of multimodal prehabilitation on reducing postoperative complications and enhancing functional capacity following colorectal cancer surgery: the PREHAB randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surgery, 158(6), 572–581.

Naik, N., Hameed, B. M., Shetty, D. K., Swain, D., Shah, M., Paul, R., Aggarwal, K., Ibrahim, S., Patil, V., & Smriti, K. (2022). Legal and ethical consideration in artificial intelligence in healthcare: who takes responsibility? Frontiers in Surgery, 9, 862322.

Nordling, P., Priebe, G., Björkelund, C., & Hensing, G. (2020). Assessing work capacity–reviewing the what and how of physicians’ clinical practice. BMC Family Practice, 21(1), 72.

Peter, R. S., Nieters, A., Kräusslich, H.-G., Brockmann, S. O., Göpel, S., Kindle, G., Merle, U., Steinacker, J. M., Rothenbacher, D., & Kern, W. V. (2022). Post-acute sequelae of covid-19 six to 12 months after infection: population based study. Bmj, 379.

Rohman, M. M., Mu’minin, N., Masuwd, M., & Elihami, E. (2024). Methodological reasoning finds law using normative studies (theory, approach and analysis of legal materials). MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 204–221.

Seaver, L. H., Khushf, G., King, N. M. P., Matalon, D. R., Sanghavi, K., Vatta, M., Wees, K., Social, A., & Committee, E. and L. I. (2022). Points to consider to avoid unfair discrimination and the misuse of genetic information: A statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). In Genetics in medicine (Vol. 24, Issue 3, pp. 512–520). Elsevier.

Soltes, V., Kubas, J., Velas, A., & Michalík, D. (2021). Occupational safety of municipal police officers: Assessing the vulnerability and riskiness of police officers’ work. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 5605.

Suparman, R. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Dan Tanggung Jawab Rumah Sakit Terhadap Dokter Dalam Sengketa Medis. Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 17(2), 188–215.

Susetiyo, W., & Iftitah, A. (2021). Peranan dan tanggungjawab pemerintah dalam pelayanan kesehatan pasca berlakunya UU cipta kerja. Jurnal Supremasi, 11(2), 92–106.

Wahyuni, S., Hidjaz, K., & Sahban, S. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Hukum Keperdataan Dokter Terhadap Pasien. Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG), 2(8), 1970–1982.

Wang, H., Wu, W., Dou, Z., He, L., & Yang, L. (2023). Performance and exploration of ChatGPT in medical examination, records and education in Chinese: pave the way for medical AI. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 177, 105173.

Wibowo, D. R. (2024). Analisis Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Mengenai Kesehatan Kerja Pasca Terbitnya Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kesehatan. Soepra Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan, 10(1), 176–196.

Ziegler, A.-G., Kick, K., Bonifacio, E., Haupt, F., Hippich, M., Dunstheimer, D., Lang, M., Laub, O., Warncke, K., & Lange, K. (2020). Yield of a public health screening of children for islet autoantibodies in Bavaria, Germany. Jama, 323(4), 339–351

Downloads

Published

2025-10-27

How to Cite

Rosmawati, Nasser, & Agus, T. (2025). Legal Responsibility of Doctors in Determining Working Capacity Based on the Results of Worker Health Examinations. Law and Economics, 19(3), 370–376. Retrieved from https://journals.ristek.or.id/index.php/LE/article/view/236