Unraveling the Threads: A Comprehensive Exploration of the Interplay be-tween Social Isolation and Academic Stress Among Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/laweco.v17i3.47Keywords:
Social Isolation, Academic Stress, Students, Coping MechanismsAbstract
In the labyrinthine landscape of student experiences, this research endeavors to unravel the intricate relationship between social isolation and academic stress. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, our study amalgamates quantitative rigor with qualitative depth to paint a comprehensive portrait of the challenges faced by students navigating the confluence of social dynamics and educational pressures. The primary objective is to understand how social isolation influences the prevalence and intensity of academic stress among students. Through a dual lens of theory and practice, the research aims to contribute to both the theoretical frameworks shaping stress models and the practical interventions implemented within educational institutions. A diverse sample of students across various educational institutions participated in this study. Quantitative data were gathered through structured surveys, probing the prevalence of social isolation and its correlation with academic stress. Qualitative insights were obtained through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, unraveling the nuanced experiences and coping mechanisms employed by students. The research affirms a significant positive correlation between social isolation and academic stress, establishing a quantifiable connection. Qualitative narratives unveil the emotional dimensions of social isolation, emphasizing loneliness, fear of failure, and a sense of disconnection as prevalent themes. Stressors such as performance expectations and a competitive academic environment emerge as catalysts that intensify stress levels among socially isolated students. Theoretical implications extend to the refinement of stress models by integrating emotional well-being and recognizing intersectionality. Practical implications advocate for tailored institutional support systems, mental health literacy initiatives, and the integration of social support into academic programs. Collaborative efforts between researchers and practitioners are essential to bridge the gap between theory and practice. As this research concludes, it beckons educators, institutions, and policymakers to heed the call for transformative change. By prioritizing the emotional and social well-being of students alongside academic success, we pave the way for educational environments that foster resilience, support, and holistic growth. This research stands as a catalyst for ongoing conversations and actions, recognizing that the journey to understanding and enhancing student experiences is an ever-evolving endeavor
References
Alderfer, C. P. (1987). An intergroup perspective on group dynamics. Handbook of Organizational Behavior, 190, 222.
Averill, J. R. (1973). Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress. Psychological Bulletin, 80(4), 286.
Baumeister, R. F., Twenge, J. M., & Nuss, C. K. (2002). Effects of social exclusion on cognitive processes: anticipated aloneness reduces intelligent thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 817.
Bergmann, C., Muth, T., & Loerbroks, A. (2019). Medical students’ perceptions of stress due to academic studies and its interrelationships with other domains of life: a qualitative study. Medical Education Online, 24(1), 1603526.
Bruns, A., Enli, G., Skogerbo, E., Larsson, A. O., & Christensen, C. (2015). The Routledge companion to social media and politics. Routledge.
Chang, C.-M., & Hsu, M.-H. (2016). Understanding the determinants of users’ subjective well-being in social networking sites: An integration of social capital theory and social presence theory. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35(9), 720–729.
Dewe, P. J., & Cooper, C. L. (2017). Work stress and coping: Forces of change and challenges. Sage.
Elder, A. M. (2018). What words can’t say: Emoji and other non-verbal elements of technologically-mediated communication. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 16(1), 2–15.
Ellis, B. J., Bianchi, J., Griskevicius, V., & Frankenhuis, W. E. (2017). Beyond risk and protective factors: An adaptation-based approach to resilience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(4), 561–587.
Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2015). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the socio-material.
Härkönen, U. (2001). The Bronfenbrenner ecological systems theory of human development.
Hristova, D., Williams, M. J., Musolesi, M., Panzarasa, P., & Mascolo, C. (2016). Measuring urban social diversity using interconnected geo-social networks. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web, 21–30.
Konu, A., & Rimpelä, M. (2002). Well-being in schools: a conceptual model. Health Promotion International, 17(1), 79–87.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1987). Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. European Journal of Personality, 1(3), 141–169.
Lee, P. W. (1999). In their own voices: An ethnographic study of low-achieving students within the context of school reform. Urban Education, 34(2), 214–244.
Lent, R. W., & Hackett, G. (1987). Career self-efficacy: Empirical status and future directions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 30(3), 347–382.
Mosanya, M. (2021). Buffering academic stress during the COVID-19 pandemic related social isolation: Grit and growth mindset as protective factors against the impact of loneliness. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 6(2), 159–174.
National Academies of Sciences and Medicine, E. (2020). Social isolation and loneliness in older adults: Opportunities for the health care system. National Academies Press.
Rajan, B., Jose, L. G., & Sundar, T. (2022). Are you hooked to the ‘Gram’? Exploring the correlation between loneliness, the fear of missing out, and Instagram usage among young Indians. Palabra Clave, 25(2).
Rook, K. S. (1985). The functions of social bonds: Perspectives from research on social support, loneliness and social isolation. In Social support: Theory, research and applications (pp. 243–267). Springer.
Rueger, S. Y., Malecki, C. K., Pyun, Y., Aycock, C., & Coyle, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of the association between perceived social support and depression in childhood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 142(10), 1017.
Singh, R. P. (2000). Entrepreneurial opportunity recognition through social networks. Psychology Press.
Travers, C. J., & Cooper, C. L. (1996). Teachers under pressure: Stress in the teaching profession. Psychology Press.
Wilson, S., Tan, S., Knox, M., Ong, A., Crawford, J., & Rudolph, J. (2020). Enabling cross-cultural student voice during COVID-19: A collective autoethnography. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 17(5), 3.
Xiyun, S., Fathi, J., Shirbagi, N., & Mohammaddokht, F. (2022). A structural model of teacher self-efficacy, emotion regulation, and psychological wellbeing among English teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 904151.
Yeager, D. S., & Walton, G. M. (2011). Social-psychological interventions in education: They’re not magic. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 267–301.
Zavaleta, D., Samuel, K., & Mills, C. (2014). Social isolation: A conceptual and measurement proposal.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Walsham Walsham, Tancredi Thorne Perlman , Demita Sihotang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
